|
|
Below are extracts from a letter sent to me by criminal solicitor Alison Stott. Stott moved from Reform Place, to Aykley Vale Chambers, Aykley Heads, Durham City where she is now an employee of the firm named Alison Stott Solicitors. She sold her business in 1998. On January 17 1996 Stott declared to the Newcastle County Court, that she was not acting for Carr but had only been assisting her. Former recorder and criminal John H. Fryer-Spedding, presently in hiding somewhere in the Lake District, Cumbria, replied to Stott, "you are either acting for Miss Carr or you are not?". Stott replied, "Well I am now sir." Barrister Michelle Temple and others were in attendance when Stott made this declaration. Two affidavits were sworn giving a full account of Stott's declaration. Note the date of Stott's letter is 6 February 1995. During the one and a half years leading up to January 17 1996 Stott had accepted work from the courts which had included the preparation of the judges bundle ready for trial. She then secretly passed it on for Carr to carry out. Carr then excluded important documentation from it. Stott was also involved with Carr and District Judge Cuthbertson in my unlawful imprisonment in 1996 and subsequent stroke which followed it.
In the first paragraph Stott accepts that the walls between the two properties No 16 and 16A are party walls. That was a very material agreement. It meant that Carr, aNational Insurance Inspector, was liable, vicarious or otherwise, for the damage that took place to the party walls on the weekend of November 13 and 14 1993 when she refused to name those re-roofing her property. Under these circumstances Carr had a case to answer. Recorder John H. Fryer Spedding had to lie his way around the fact that the walls between the properties are party walls. He could have saved himself the trouble. Stott's acceptance that the walls between the two properties are party walls could have saved him the trouble of lying.
Criminal solicitor Stott goes on to say that as far as she can see it was a mistake when my father sold No 16 to the Green's " for him in not conveying the alleyway land which was in his ownership at the time. " My fathers affidavits made it clear that there was never any intention to sell the alleyway land. But nonetheless, Stott here also agrees that my father held title to the alleyway land. Again criminal recorder John H, Fryer-Spedding could have saved himself the trouble of lying. By her agreement here Carr had no case in falsely alleging that she held title to the alleyway land. But then take a look at what criminal solicitor Alison Stott then goes on to write. "We believe that the passageway....was not in your parents ownership in any event, as it was not included in the conveyance of land to your parents in 1949 when they bought from Mr Sharp." This is simply astonishing! Do I need to say what I, and those of sound mind would think upon reading this letter? Stott goes on to say, " Your parents occupied the land between 1963 until 1982 when they sold it to Mrs and Mrs Green". Earlier, as can be seen, criminal solicitor Stott says that "it was a mistake by the conveyancer when my father sold to Mr and Mrs Green in not conveying that part of the land in his ownership at the time."! In fact my father and others agreed in affidavits that both he and I had been occupying the alleyway land from as far back as the 1950's. After 12 years of of continued and undisturbed possession of land any person in such occupation of land then acquires title to it. Criminal solicitor Alison Stott has thus conceeded these major issues. For the most part, Carr then had no case to argue.
Of further material fact, Stott mentions that Carr would be supporting her application to the Durham District Land Registry for alleged, "adverse" possession of the alleyway land with the Statutory Declarations from Robert William Green, Frederick Seadon, and Paul Graney". There was no way that Carr could have registered anty title at HM Land Registry. There was simply no way that she could could claim 12 years of adverse possession, not even if she added to it any alleged adverse possession by the Green's. Green's never made any such allegation anyway. They did not even try to convey to Carr any alleged interest in the alleyway land anyway. The law states that all conveyances of land and property must be by deed. But criminal solicitor Stott does not appear to be aware of that, or does she? Of further very important relevance, only the Statutory Declaration sworn Paul Graney was material. Graney, a solicitor of Newbottle Street, Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, swore perjury in his statutory declaration. A copy of it is included in the pages within this site. Criminal John H. Fryer-Spedding protected him as well. The evidence to show Graney's perjury is also included on this site, along with his affidavit which he swore upon being confronted with that evidence. Of further material importance is when did Criminals Stott and Carr first come into possession of these Statutory Declarations? I cannot say more than this for now, but if police follow up this matter, I can assure them they will find further evidence of Carr's criminal acts. Mr and Mrs Green should also be interviewed by police on this matter where I can also assure them they will learn even more of the criminal acts carried out against me by Carr and her partner in crime solicitor Alison Stott. Police obviously dont want to do this because both Carr, Stott and others are being protected by Masonic Mafia policemen who are under the control of mason Chief Constable of Northumbria Police, Mr C. Strachan. They still require Carr as a weapon against me. Mason Chief Constables normally carry out similar acts against all those they regard as being anti-mason. In these circumstances they will protect the criminals and persue and torture the victims.
Referring to the final paragraph of criminal solicitor Stott's letter, there was evidence by way of statutory declarations and affidavits that I and my late father had used the alleyway land well in excess of the time required by law to acquire title to it. My father had also sworn an affidavit in which he said that upon his death he wanted me to be sole owner of the alleyway. Criminal former recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding had those placed before as well, but having set his heart on perverting the course of justice anyway, would he really have wanted to take into consideration any evidence that would have assisted me? When he had little choice but to consider such evidence, he wormed his way around it by a series of lies. Criminal solicitor Stott also says that there was no evidence that my father passed on rights relative to the alleyway land to me. In fact by his affidavit swearing that we had jointly used the alleyway, there was no need for him to pass on his rights over it to me. However, he did make the situation clear in his affidavit, but District Judge Cuthbertson, sitting at the Durham County Court, again perverted the course of justice by ignoring my late fathers affidavits and struck out my fathers action to go back into possession of our land by claiming that it was an abuse of court time. The only abuse that I can see is that of him being allowed to sit as a judge. How many I wonder, have suffered at his hands? He has still failed to pay my bill to him of one hundred thousand pounds. The sum claimed from him is about set to rise as are my bills to criminals Stott and Carr. Maybe the man heading the Masonic Judicial and legal Mafia, Lord Irvine might decide to pay Cuthbertson's Bill?
Below is only more of the evidence to show the fraud, and conspiracy to defraud that criminals Carr and solicitor Stott have used against me. I can show by evidence that their criminal acts are being protected by high authority. I have now also found the link between criminal former recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding and at least one of of his criminal acts, and a firm of solicitors. In time I will publish the evidence to show this as well.
Return to general index of photocopies
