Click the paragraph to see photocopies of the evidence referred to.

1) Go to photocopy of opening paragraph of Spedding's approved transcript of  judgment showing that he wrongly tried the actions as if they had been subject of a consolidation order. He was thus in contempt of supreme Court Rules. He was required to have seen an order for consolidation of the cases. At the time an order refusing consolidation of the cases was in force. My wife and I did not own No. 17 as stated by Spedding.

2) Go to a photocopy of the order refusing consolidation made on June 1 1994

3) Go to a copy taken from Spedding's approved transcript of judgment showing that it was his intention to deprive me of my rights.

4) Go to a photocopy of an order made by the Duham County Court showing that Deputy District Judge Baird unlawfully heard an appeal from an order of a District Judge. An order appealled from a District Judge must be heard by a Circuit Judge. Mr Baird would have been aware that he was not allowed by law to hear my appeal in this matter. Shortly after that time Baird was the first one to hear the cases between Carr and I. The axe he had to grind because I had previously exposed him was well and truly sharpened for use against me. What he had carried out against me were criminal acts. There are more facts surrounding Baird's criminal activities.

5) Spedding would have been aware of Section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. The Act that says that all rights ect. existing at the time of a sale of a property shall be deemed to pass with the property. Here criminal former recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding again defies law of which he was fully aware of so that he could fabricate false reasons to rule against me. My father had also sworn that when he and my mother sold the property to us that right passed with the sale. However that right was and remains protected by virtue of Section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. That right still remains but criminals such as Spedding have defied Law to stop me from excercising my rights. Of course Spedding has been shown herein to have agreed that he was depriving me of my rights. No judge can deprive anyone of their rights. Rights are safeguarded by national and international law. But UK courts are now shown to be carrying out criminal acts in regard to this.

6) Spedding had the title deeds to both respective properties No. 16 and 16A  in front of him, and agreed that. He again lied by stating that No's 16 and 16A had been divided on February 2 1976. This lie was very material. If the properties had been divided at that time, then no rights could pass with No. 16A other than any that were reserved or granted in the conveyance at that time. Since before even 1947 both properties had already been divided and had been in continual diversity of occupation since that time. Any rights of tenants in No 16A, relative to rights privileges, etc. over the land of No. 16 passed with the sale of our property to us when No. 16A was conveyed to my wife on February 2 1976 unless they had been specifically revoked. Spedding's evil brain obviously looked for a way around this fact, but the only way around it was for him to lie again.

7) Here is the proof that criminal Spedding had again lied in regard to the above paragraph.

8) Spedding lied when he stated that the Enquiries before contract at the time criminal Carr purchased No. 16 had been lost. At no time whatsoever in any proceeding between Carr and I had that matter been raised. I am being denied access to evidence by the Judicial Masonic Mafia operating from the Newcastle Combined Courts. They will not allow me access to the tape recordings of the proceedings heard before their criminal colleage John H. Fryer-Spedding.

9) Spedding said that he had not seen the statutory declarations used to lodge a caution at HM Land Registry. Despite saying he had not seen them, he said thay were the "usual statutory declarations.". I had placed before him copies of these document in quadruple. He none other than saw that I had also placed before him copies of an affidavit  sworn by solicitor Mr Paul Graney, of Newbottle Street, Houghton-le Spring, Tyne-Wear after I obtained evidence that he had sworn false information in one of those statutory statutory declarations that had been used to lodge a caution on the land subject of dispute. The man, if that is what I can call criminal Spedding, most certainly saw that evidence but again lied his way out of it when he realised that evidence would assist me. His Masonic Judicial and Police Mafia brothers are still protecting him at my expence and torture. They will not break me. I know that God Almighty exists and I do not regard Lucifer as my helper.

10) Despite his many lies criminal Spedding could not deny my late father was the one most likely to hold title to the alleyway land, in fact both my late father I did hold title to it. By further criminal means, though Carr has no title to the alleyway land, she has now been allowed to register it in her name. Criminal District Judge Cuthbertson struck out my fathers action to go back into possession of our land. He had effectively overruled the higher court decision made by criminal Spedding. A lower court cannot overrule a decision made by the higher court. As the Durham County Court is now shown by evidence to be a hotbed of corruption, does anyone really expect its judges to adhere to law anyway?

There is a considerable amount of further evidence against criminal Spedding. God willing. I will be publishing more of it as time allows.

11) Important files that would have assisted me greatly in the litigation between criminal Carr and I went missing from the offices of solicitors Smith and Graham of Durham City. There are circumstances surrounding the acts of a senior mason police officer which might be linked to this matter. It is another example of what happens to those who dare to face up to the fact that the Masonic Mafia do rule or greatly influence our system of none justice.

12) Solicitor Nancy Bone another criminal since struck off, retained by lien all of my files relative to the first months of litigation between criminal Carr and I. The circumstances of how that came about is a long story. I applied to Durham County Court to be allowed to go to the office of Nancy Bone to take copies from my files so that I could continue to carry on. When Bone breached that order I reported her contempt to the Durham County Court. I received the reply that criminal District Judge Scott-Phillips had said that my visit to Bones office was not by order of the court but had only been done by Bone's consent . Here is part of  the evidence that District Judge Scott-Phillips was a liar. He had protected Bone against a charge of contempt of Court. Later, Bone's business was closed down and she was struck from the register of solicitors. I had not been the only one of her victims. Bone ended up before a criminal court and it would seem her sentence was very minimal. I never obtained my files back that Bone had held until long after the hearing before criminal John H. Fryer-Spedding.

13) Part of the evidence of deliberate perjury sworn by Miss Shirley Carr and which has been placed before criminal Masonic Mafia judges and police who have chosen to ignore it because they need criminal Carr for use as a weapon against me. This is the normal way that the  Masonic Mafia controlled authorities work when they need to destroy a man who will not give way to their crimes.

14) Here is the evidence of criminal Carr's perjury in respect of her sworn statement contained in her affidavit of  May 12, 1994 when she then swore perjury by her statement: " The situation was eventually resolved when Mr & Mrs Green had the property connected to the main drainage system in February 1988."

15) Go to evidence that Carr swore further perjury when she falsely stated in her affidavit of May 12 1994 that it had been Mrs & Mrs Green who had the drainage work carried out on their property in February of 1988. In fact the evidence shown here proves it was criminal Carr herself who had that work carried out.

16) Some criminal acts of solicitor Alison Stott of Aykley Vale Chambers, Aykley Heads, Durham City exposed.

17) Go to a copy of the Statutory Declaration containing perjury sworn by criminal solicitor Paul Graney.

18) Go to part one of some of the evidence to show that criminal solicitor Graney had sworn perjury.

19) Go to second part of some of the evidence to show that criminal solicitor Graney  had sworn perjury.

20) Go to the affidavit sworn by criminal solicitor Paul Graney after he was confronted with evidence showing he had sworn perjury in his statutory declaration.

21) Go to a letter received from the Clerk to the Northumbria Police Authority Mr L.N. Elton. I submitted my complaints about Northumbria police Officers and its Chief Constable  and mason Mr C. Strachan under Section 86 of PACE (The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. My complaints also refer to Mr Strachan for failing in his duty. Mr Elton says that the matter is to be investigated by the Deputy Chief Constable. Under PACE the Northumbria Police Authority are deemed by law under the Police and Criminal Evidence act to refer my allegations and complaints to another police force for investigation. This is more evidence that the Masonic Mafia are waiting for events to overtake me. If Northumbria Police had done the job required of them, criminal Miss Shirley Carr, solicitor and criminal Alison Stott and others should have been subject of arrest by now. But true to Masonic Mafia tactics, where those are concerned who try to expose their evil organisation, Masonic Mafia police will take action against the victims of crime and protect the criminal. They are aware that the courts are infested by masons so they become the untouchables.

22) Go to paragraph 7 of Carr's sworn affidavit of May 12 1994. This affidavit was almost in total content perjury and attempted deception. Criminal former John H. Fryer-Spedding   and other corrupt judges who saw this affidavit, would have to have been half wits  not to see that the atatements being sworn by Carr in her affidavit of May 12 1994 were perjury. I do not accuse them of being half wits, I accuse them of being criminals with an obvious intent that I was to be the victim of their crime. They are being protected from Masonic Mafia Headquarters situated at the London Court of Appeal. Irvine, Woolf, Bingham, Straw, and PM Blair have been sent evidence of my allegations, by failing to take action on that evidence as is the duty required of them, they are guilty of the crime of misconduct in public office. The consequences arising out of this may be about to be put to the test. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.

23) Go to paragraphs 8) to 12) of her affidavit of May 12 1994 which almost in total is perjury. This affidavit was of course seen  by the various Judges named herein operating on the North East Court Circuit. They saw this evidence and totally ignored it like all material evidence that would have assisted my actions.

24) Go to extracts taken from a survey report carried out by Mr Ian Smales, a surveyor employed by Carr. In it he confirms that Carr had committed perjury when she swore that no water drained down her property's rear yard in the direction of our property No 16A. Carr had resided at No 16 The Lyons, from August 26 1988. Smales carried out his survey in 1995. Can anyone really believe that in all that time Carr was not aware that her property's rear yard  was sloped in the direction of our property?  Can anyone also believe that Carr  had not been aware  in all that time that all water falling and seeping onto the rear of her property was not draining down her property's rear yard in the direction of our property No. 16A?   Read here what Mr Smales said he did with a bucket of water and what the outcome was. The fact that Carr is nothing but an outright liar is again proved  by  Mr Smales and that lies such as these were included into her affidavits which then became perjured evidence. An affidavit sworn by Carr on May 12 1994, of relevance to Smales survey report shown here, is also published within this section.

25) Go to further evidence of criminal corruption at Durham County Court. Why did a man who worked there recently end up being found dead in a river at Weardale? Why did local TV say just before Christmas 1999 that his disappearance was believed to be something to do with his work. Police say their are no suspicious cercumstances in the matter of his death. Can the police be trusted in the light that so many criminals too are active within the police? 

26) Here are some photographs of my family before Carr  and the Masonic Mafia managed to destroy us as a family.

27)  Click here to see more evidence of the criminal activities of solicitor Alison Stott aided and abetted by her partner in crime Miss Shirley Carr. How many solicitors are there out there like Stott? How many criminals like these are being protected by high authority when anti-masons are involved?

28) Here is the affidavit sworn by my wife Joyce Kellett on October 8 1996. In it she verifies the declaration made by criminal solicitor Alison Stott that up until that day of January 17 1996 she had not been acting for her partner in crime Miss Shirley Carr but had only been assisting her.  A copy of this affidavit was suppled to Legal Services Ombudsman Ann Abraham. Upon receipt of a copy of this affidavit the Legal Services Ombudsman' office replied, "...the affidavit by Mrs Kellett is mainly about what happened in court."! This affidavit, and there is another was proof that Stott had only been assisting Carr up until that time. This is evidence of Stott's gross misconduct which along with others, amounts to a criminal act

In these circumstances, for the previous one and a half years prior to January 17 1996, Stott had no legal standing. During that time Stott had been given work by the courts to carry out relative to the cases between Carr and I. The work had included the preparation of the judges bundle, which Stott then secretly passed on for Carr to carry out. Carr then deliberately left out documentation from it. Stott was also involved in the granting of an injunction against me on October 17 1995. Because she had no legal standing at that time by virtue of her declaration to the Newcastle County Court on  17 January 1996, both that injunction, and my subsequent imprisonment arising from it were also unlawful. I had a stroke while I was in prison. The injunction order had been obtained by means of fraud. Parties to that fraud were Stott and Carr  with DJ Cuthbertson heavily implicated. Under a ruling of the late Lord Denning, "No order of a court or government minister can stand if fraud has been used to obtain it." That injunction order granted in the circumstances sworn by my wife does not stand. Not any number of corrupt judges can rule against this fact unless they are corrupt.

29) Click here to see part of the evidence showing action that Carr took to ensure that the drainage from the rear of her property No. 16  was being channeled through to our property No. 16A. It is taken from part of  the video film evidence shown to Criminal former recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding. The video film evidence is to be converted into photographs which hopefully following that,  will allow more evidence to be shown of just what Carr has been allowed to get away with and by whom.

30) Click here to see proof that a written statement being made to me by the Northumbria Police Authority is untrue.

To follow shortly.  More photocopied evidence of the criminal activities carried out against me by the Masonic Judicial and Police  Mafia. Also to be included are further photocopies of perjury used by Miss Shirley Carr during the civil litigation proceedings between us. The police are in receipt of this evidence but have failed in the duty required of them to act on it. Instead they act on any allegation that criminal Carr decides make against me. Masonic Mafia controlled Police would be expected to do this anyway. Sometimes its only a good bait that can bring rats out of their holes. It is not a good situation for the bait though.

Return to opening page

Go to page index

Go to index of photocopied evidence.